Original Research Article

The Korean Journal of Crop Science. 31 December 2015. 412-420
https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2015.60.4.412

ABSTRACT


MAIN

Rice is one of the main cereal crops with wheat and corn in the world. For effective rice cultivation, enough nutrient condition is needed. However, level of plant-available phosphate (P) is very low in soils. Most of soils in the world are reported as P deficient condition, even available P content seldom exceeds 10 μm (Bieleski, 1973). Therefore, it is one of the main factors in reduction of rice production throughout the world. P deficient can be overcome by treating chemical fertilizer. When P fertilizer treated, plant could absorb just 20% of treated P fertilizer and about 80% of those is combined with other inorganic compounds then changed as unavailable P which plant cannot uptake. Around 90% of chemical P fertilizer was made using phosphate rocks (Brunner, 2010). The remaining amount of phosphate rock is expected to be extinguished within 50~100 years if used as these days (Steen, 1998; De Haes et al., 2009; Smit et al., 2009; Vaccari, 2009; Cordell, 2010.). Therefore, many scientists have been investigated to develop more P deficient tolerance rice (Kaeppler et al., 2000; Wissuwa et al., 2005; Beebe et al., 2006; Heuer et al., 2009). In P deficient condition, growth performances are changed. The leaf expansion, leaf surface area and leaf number are significantly reduced in P deficient condition. The process of carbohydrate utilization become slow so dark green leaf is easily discovered for buildup of carbohydrates in leaf. The shoot growth is also reduced in such a condition.

Hung et al. (1985) and Wissuwa et al. (1998) reported tillering ability and dry weight could be the best marker to monitor phosphate-deficient tolerance in experiment of using indica type rice. To develop more P deficient tolerance rice, selecting of elite line by screening with large population or genetic resources is essential. Even though dry weight and tiller number could be a marker for selecting P deficient tolerance rice, it is time and labor consumed work in rice breeding. Therefore, when screening P deficient tolerance rice using the huge of genetic resources, it could be more effective that selecting elite line by more elaborate and accurate screening method after reducing target genetic resources by rough screening method. In this study, we firstly investigated the change of agronomic characters in rice under P deficient condition to confirm the best marker in selecting P deficient tolerance japonica rice. Then we tried to develop more simple and effective method to rough screening of P deficient tolerance rice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis of nutrient content in soil

The soil was collected before rice cultivation. Three samples of soil in each plot were collected and dried at 60~70°C for 3 days. Dried soil samples were crushed well and sieved using 2 mm sieve. 5 g of soil sample were measured and put in grass flask. 20 ml of extraction solution was added in each grass flask then shook for ten min at 200 rpm. Extraction solution was contained 0.33 M CH3CHOOH, 0.15 M lactic acid, 0.03 M NH4F and 0.05 M (NH4)2SO4. After shook ten min, extracted solution was filtered then available phosphorus was measured by Lancaster methods (NIAST, 2002), nitrogen and carbon content were measured by Kjeldahl method (Varley, 1966) and inorganic component were measured by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry.

Investigation of finding the best marker in selection P deficient tolerance rice

The Hwayeongbyeo is used as material and cultivated in paddy field which have be maintained various fertilizer conditions over twenty years. Fertilizer condition have been created like as– control (NPK), nitrogen deficient (-N), phosphate deficient (-P), potassium deficient (-K) and all fertilizer deficient (-NPK) treatment. The amount of fertilizer was treated as following the standard rice cultivation method of rice (RDA, 2001). The thirty days old plants were transplanted as three plants per hill at 20 th of May in 2013~2014. Agronomic traits were investigated 40 days after heading stage. Culm length, panicle length and tiller number of 10 plants were investigated in each plot. For analyzing the yield traits, 100 plants of each plot were cultivated. After dried and adjusted the water content of seed as 14%, seed weight of 100 plants were measured.

Plant materials and cultivation of rice in bed tray for rough screening

The 480 kinds of rice genetic resources were used as materials (Supplementary Table 1). Rice genetic resources was sowed after soaking 3 days in 30°C water after disinfection. The rice bed tray was divided into twenty spaces and filled with P deficient soils. Ten rice seed of each genetic resource was sowed in a space, covered with P deficient soils then incubated in green house for three days. Rice bed trays were put on tray with water (Fig. 1). After four week cultivation in green house, ten rice plant in each genetic resources was cleaned and dried for three days in 70°C dry oven. The dry weight of plant in each rice genetic resources was measured then fifty rice genetic resource were selected for further research.

Table 1.

Nutrient content in soil of paddy field and P deficient soil before rice cultivation.

ConditionpH (1:5)ECOM (g/kg)P2O5 (mg/kg)Exchangeable elements (cmol/kg)Carbon (%)Nitrogen (%)

KCaMg

Control5.65a0.45a24.1a266d0.13a3.93a0.94a17.12a2.51a
-N6.01a0.42a24.4a362e0.20a3.76a0.91a17.26a2.49a
-P5.66a0.43a22.8a12b0.15a3.48a0.80a17.56a2.51a
-K5.67a0.40a24.1a249d0.11a3.88a0.90a16.80a2.54a
-NPK5.79a0.47a23.7a45c0.11a3.77a0.85a17.40a2.52a

P deficient soil5.69a0.41a22.7a4.7a0.13a3.8 a0.87a17.15a2.47a

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjcs/2015-060-04/A0350600402/images/KJCS-60-412_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.
Sowing of rice genetic resources in bed tray (A)~(B) and growth of rice genetic resources in bed tray (C).

Fifty of selected genetic resources were cultivated in paddy field with three fertilizer conditions. 9 kg of nitrogen, 4.5 kg of phosphate and 5.7 kg of potassium per were treated 10 are for control condition. For P deficient condition (no P), the 0 kg of P fertilizer were treated in field which filled with P deficient soil. For low P (low P) condition, the 4.5 kg of P fertilizer treated in field which filled with conventional cultivated soil. Nitrogen and potassium were treated like as control condition in both P deficient and low P condition. Agronomic characters like as tiller number, plant height and dry weight were investigated forty days after flowering date.

Statistical analysis

SAS version 9.2 (SPSS Inc) was used for data analysis. Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) was carried out to identify significant differences (P < 0.05) between individual treatments.

RESULTS

The nutrient contents of soil before rice cultivation

In analyzing the soil nutrient content in paddy field with various fertilizer conditions, all nutrient content were not significantly different except P2O5 (Table 1). P2O5 content in soil was 266 mg per 1 kg of soil in control condition. In –K condition, P2O5 content in soil was not significantly different compare to that in control condition. In –N condition, P2O5 content in soil was increased as 362 mg per 1 kg of soil. However P2O5 content in –P and –NPK soil were significantly decreased as 12 and 45 mg per 1 kg of soil, respectively.

The nutrient content of P deficient soil for rice bed tray experiment was also measured. The P2O5 was in P deficient soil was 4.7 ppm per kg. Other nutrient content like as K, Ca and Mg did not show significant difference compare to conventional cultivated soil.

P effect on rice growth

In ripening stage, culm length was 64 cm in control condition. That was about 62.3~63.5 cm in –N, -P and –K condition. Culm length was 55 cm in –NPK condition. Panicle length was 18 cm in control condition. In –P condition, panicle length was 20.4 cm. In –N, -K and –NPK condition, panicle length was about 18.4~ 19.8 cm. Tiller number was 11.5 in control condition. It was significantly decreased in –N, -P and –NPK condition as 8.8, 7.2 and 6.0 respectively. However, it was not different in –K condition a 11.1 (Table 2).

Table 2.

The growth characters of Hwayeongbyeo according to fertilizer condition.

TreatmentsCulm length (cm)Panicle length (cm)Tiller number (No./plant)

Control64.0 ± 2.3b18.3 ± 1.4a11.5 ± 2.3d
-N62.3 ± 2.7b19.8 ± 2.1a8.8 ± 1.3c
-P63.5 ± 1.9b20.4 ± 1.9a7.2 ± 1.2b
-K62.5 ± 2.1b18.4 ± 1.6a11.1 ± 2.1d
-NPK55.2 ± 2.6a18.4 ± 1.1a6.0 ± 1.5a

Among agronomic characters, thousand grains weight did not show significant difference according to fertilizer treatment. Number of grain per spikelet was 85.1 in control condition. It was slightly decreased in –K condition as 81.6 but did not showed significant difference. In –N and –P condition, it was similar as 74.1 and 71.4 respectively. In –NPK condition, it was dramatically decreased as 65.3. Ripening rate was 83.9% in control condition. In –P and –K condition, it was similar with control condition as 83.1% and 84.4%. In –N condition, ripening rate was 72.3% and it was 77% in –NPK condition. Yield of milled rice showed the largest difference according to different fertilizer condition. In control condition, it was 456.1 kg per 10 are. In –K condition, it was slightly decreased as 445.4 but did not showed significant difference. In –N condition, yield of milled rice was 355 kg per 10 are and it was 214 and 257 kg per 10 are in –NPK and –P condition, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

The yield traits of Hwayeongbyeo according to different fertilizer treatments

TreatmentsNo. of grain per spikelet (No.)1000 grains weight (g)Ripening rate (%)Yield of milled rice (kg/10a)

Control85.1 ± 15b22.1 ± 0.3a83.9 ± 2.1a456.1 ± 25c
-N74.1 ± 13ab22.3 ± 0.4a72.3 ± 1.8b355.3 ± 21b
-P71.4 ± 11b22.3 ± 0.8a83.1 ± 2.2b257.3 ± 29b
-K81.6 ± 8b22.6 ± 0.7a84.4 ± 2.1b445.1 ± 33c
-NPK65.3 ± 9a21.1 ± 0.7a77.0 ± 1.5a214.4 ± 15a

Rough screening and cultivation in paddy field using selected materials

After cultivation in rice tray filled with P deficient soil for four weeks, plant dry weights of 480 genetic resources were measured. It was from 0.01 to 0.341 g. To further study, we selected fifty genetic resources among 480 genetic resources (Fig. 2).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjcs/2015-060-04/A0350600402/images/KJCS-60-412_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.
Plant dry weight of (A) all rice genetic resources and (B) selected rice genetic resources cultivated under bed tray contained P deficient soil.

In field experiment with different P condition, several agronomic characters were measured. Plant dry weight was showed significant difference according to P condition in soils. It was 17.2 g in no P condition. It was increased as 27.37 g and 34.24 g in low P and control condition, respectively. Plant height was 66.4 cm in no P condition. It also increased as 80.3 cm in low P condition. However it did not show significant difference in control condition as 81.6 cm compare to low P condition. Culm length was 22.1 cm in no P condition. It did not show significant difference in low P and control condition compare to no P condition as 23.5 cm and 23.7 cm, respectively. Tiller number was 5.4 in no P condition. It was increased as 8.7 and 10.7 in low P and control condition, respectively.

The correlation of plant dry weight per plant with tiller number in ripening stage was investigated. It was showed high degree correlation as 0.7638 in no P condition. Even though it was slightly decreased in low P condition, it was still high as 0.6274 (Fig 4). Plant dry weight in rough screening and those in paddy field was showed high degree correlation especially in no P condition as 0.7576. The correlation between those was decreased as 0.418 and 0.298 in low and control P condition, respectively (Fig. 5 (A)~(C)). Tiller number in ripening stage which cultivated in no P condition was showed significant correlation with dry weight in rough screening as 0.7915. It was decreased as 0.6987 in low P condition, and it was further decreased as 0.1921 in control P condition (Fig. 5 (D)~(F)).

DISCUSSION

In analyzing of phosphate fertilizer effect on rice growth characters, several characters were changed (Table 2, Table 3). Among yield traits, grain number per spikelet, ripening rate and tiller number were changed. As the change of yield traits, actual yield of milled rice was also changed. Khalid reported yield of rice was increased by treating phosphate fertilizer initially up to certain level due to increase of panicle number (Khalid, 2013). Aziz et al. (2006) also reported the phosphorus deficiency could reduce the crop yield by 10~15%. Yield of milled rice was significantly decreased in all condition except potassium deficient condition. In potassium deficient condition, even though grain number of spikelet was decreased about 10%, yield of milled rice did not show significant difference with control condition. However yield of milled rice was greatly influenced by nitrogen and phosphate condition. The 26% of tiller number, 20% of grain number and 14% of ripening rate were decreased by nitrogen deficiency. In phosphate deficient condition, the 32% of tiller number and 17% of grain number were decreased. Yield of milled rice was decreased about 32% by nitrogen deficiency, 54% by phosphate deficiency. These results might indicate decrease of tiller number is the main factor in decrease of yield in rice under phosphate deficient condition. Through this result, we would confirm phosphate is needed to get reliable tiller number and yield in rice. Thus tiller number could be the best marker in selection of phosphate deficient tolerance rice not only in indica type but also japonica type.

In analyzing nutrient content of soil, P content in P deficient soil which is used in rough screening was similar with P deficient paddy field. With these results, we could confirm the growth of rice in paddy field which contained low P could be replaced by cultivation of rice in P deficient soil because the nutrient condition of P deficient soil was similar as P deficient paddy field.

After measuring plant dry weight of rice genetic resources which cultivated in rice bed tray contained P deficient soil, we select fifty rice genetic resources then cultivated those in paddy field with three kinds of P condition (Fig. 2). Plant dry weight and tiller number per plant in ripening stage were shown significant difference under different P condition. Those were the lowest in no P condition, increased in low P condition and further increased in control condition. Plant height was also increased in low P condition compare to no P condition. However it did not showed difference in control condition compare to low P condition. Culm length did not show any difference under difference P condition (Fig. 3). Though these results, we could consider plant dry weight and tiller number could be increased by treated P nutrient. So we investigated the correlation of plant dry weight with tiller number under different P condition. It was 0.7638, 0.6274 and 0.5077 in no P, low P and control condition, respectively (Fig. 4). Even it was slightly decreased according to add P fertilizer, plant dry weight was still showed high degree correlation with tiller number in P deficient condition. Though these results, we confirmed that plant dry weight could be measured instead of tiller number under P deficient condition. Finally we checked the correlation of plant dry weight in rough screening with plant dry weight and tiller number in ripening stage in paddy. Plant dry weigh in rough screening was showed high degree correlation as 0.7576 with those in paddy field especially under no P condition (Fig. 5). We could expect that P deficient tolerance rice which was show high dry weight under P deficient condition could also get high dry weight under rice bed tray filled with P deficient soil. And P sensitive rice could not grow well not only in P deficient paddy field but also in rice bed tray filled with P deficient soil. In analyzing the correlation of plant dry weight in rough screening with tiller number in ripening stage, it showed high degree correlation as 0.7915 and 0.6987 under P deficient condition (Fig. 5). We could consider plant dry weight in rough screening was highly related with tiller number in ripening stage cultivated in P deficient condition. Although tiller number of rice under P deficient condition could not be expected clearly by measuring plant dry weight though rough screening, we could select P deficient tolerance rice which could get more tillers under P deficient condition by measuring plant dry weight after cultivated in P deficient soil. We expect that this rough screening method of P deficiency tolerance rice could help saving labor and time in rice breeding.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjcs/2015-060-04/A0350600402/images/KJCS-60-412_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Change of plant dry weight (A), plant height (B), culm length (C) and tiller number per plant (D) according to P condition.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjcs/2015-060-04/A0350600402/images/KJCS-60-412_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.
Correlation of dry weight with tiller number in ripening stage under (A) in no P, (B) in low P, (C) in control condition.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kjcs/2015-060-04/A0350600402/images/KJCS-60-412_F5.jpg
Fig. 5.
(A)-(C): Correlation of plant dry weight in rough screening with plant dry weight of selected rice cultivated in (A) no P, (B) low P and (C) control condition. (D)-(F): Correlation of plant dry weight in rough screening with tiller number of selected rice cultivated in (A) no P, (B) low P and (C) control condition.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was carried out with the support of the ‘Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01156001)’, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Republic of Korea.

Appendix

Appendix.

The list of rice genetic resources for rough screening.

ListLinesListLinesListLinesListLines

1Andabyeo (안다벼)64Heugjinjubyeo(흑진주벼)127Mihyangbyeo(미향벼)190Yeonghojinmi(영호진미)
2Anmi(안미)65Heugnambyeo(흑남벼)128Mikwang(미광)191Yongjubyeo(영주벼)
3Aranghyangchalbyeo(아량항찰벼)66Heugseol(흑설)129Milyang154(밀양154)192Yongmunbyeo(영문벼)
4Areumbyeo(아름벼)67Hongjinju(홍진주)130Milyang215(밀양215)1932428
5Baegjinju 1(백진주1)68Honong(호농)131Milyang221(밀양221)19404P251
6Baekogchal(백옥찰)69Hopum(호품)132Milyang226(밀양226)19592 Tangi2964
7Boramchan(보람찬)70Hopyeong(호평)133Milyang23(밀양23)196Akenohoshi
8Borami(보라미)71Hwanambyeo(하남벼)134Munjangbyeo(문장벼)197Akidagomachi
9Boseogchal(보석찰)72Hwanggeumbora(황금보라)135Naepungbyeo(내평벼)198Apo
10Boseogheugchal(보석흑찰)73Hwanggeumnodeul(황금노들)136Namcheonbyeo(남천벼)199ARPA THALY
11Cheongcheongbyeo(청청벼)74Hwanggeumnuri(황금누리)137Nampyeongbyeo(남평벼)200ARPA303
12Cheongcheongjinmi(청청진미)75Hwarang(화랑)138Namyeongbyeo(남영벼)201Aya
13Cheonghaejinmi(청해진미)76Hwaseongbyeo(화설벼)139Nogyang(녹양)202B1053A-5-10-1-2
14Cheongho(청호)77Hwasin 1(화신1)140Nunbora(눈보라)203Basmati 389
15Cheongnam(청남)78Hwayeongbyeobyeo(화영벼)141Obongbyeo(오봉벼)204Basmati wx
16Cheongsumi(청수미)79Hyangmibyeo 2(향미벼2)142Odae1(오대1)205Binhae selection 1
17Jeogjinjuchal(적진주찰)80Hyangnambyeo(향남벼)143Odaebyeo(오대벼)206Bugkyeong selection
18Hanareum 2(한아름2)81Ilmibyeo(일미벼)144Onnuri(온누리)207C18
19Chilbo(칠보)82Ilpumbyeo(일품벼)145Pungmi(풍미)208C21
20Chilseongbyeo(풍미)83Jangseongbyeo(장성벼)146Pungmi 1(풍미1)209C39
21Chucheongbyeo(추청벼)84Jeogjinjubyeo(적진주벼)147Saechucheongbyeo(새추청벼)210C40
22Dacheong(다청)85Jeogjinjuchal(적진주찰)148Saegyehwa(세계화)211Chanseobyeo(찬세벼)
23Dami(다미)86Jinbaek(진백)149Saegyejinmi(세계진미)212Chen Ma Ai
24Danmi(단미)87Jinbo(진보)150Saenuri(새누리)213Chen Shin Ai4
25Dasan 1(다산1)88Jinbongbyeo(진봉벼)151Saesangjubyeo(새상주벼)214Cheongmu
26Dasan 2(다산2)89Jinbubyeo(진부벼)152Sambaegbyeo(삼백벼)215Cheonsoo
27Dasanbyeo(다산벼)90Jinbuolbyeo(진부올벼)153Samdeogbyeo(삼덕벼)216Congshengla
28Deuraechan(드래찬)91Jinmibyeo(진미벼)154Samgangbyeo(삼강벼)217Dan9877
29Donganbyeo(동안벼)92Jinsumi(진수미)155Samgwang(삼왕)218Daw dam
30Donghaejinmi(동해진미)93Joami(조아미)156Sampyeongbyeo(삼평벼)219Dharial
31Dongjin 1(동진1)94Joan(조운)157Sandeuljinmi(산들진미)220Dian 35
32Dongjin 2(동진2)95Jogwang(조광)158Sanggolbyeo(상골벼)221DNJ46
33Dongjinbyeo(동진벼)96Joryeongbyeo(조령벼)159Sangjubyeo(상주벼)222Dohoku 144
34Dongjinchalbyeo(동진찰벼)97Anmi(안미)160Sangjuchalbyeo(상주찰벼)223Dragon Eyeball 100
35Gangchan(강찬)98Josaengheugchal(조생흑찰)161Sangmibyeo(상미벼)224Erguailai
36Chinnong (친농)99Joun(조운)162Sangnambatbyeo(상남밭벼)225esp-4
37Gayabyeo(가야벼)100Junambyeo(주남벼)163Sangok(상옥)226Fujihikari
38Geonganghongmi(건강홍미)101Junamjosaeng(주남조생)164Sangun(상운)227Gamheukmi(감흑미)
39Geumgangbyeo(금강벼)102Jopyeong(조평)165Seolgaeng(설갱)228Gamhongmi(감홍미)
40Geumyeong(금영)103Junghwabyeo(중화벼)166Seolhyangchalbyeo(설향찰벼)229Gebaecheonghyangna
41Geurubyeo(그루벼)104Jungmo 1004(중모1004)167Seomyeong(세명)230Gillim collection 1
42Goami 2(고아미2)105Jungmo1005(중모1005)168Seopyeong(세평)231Gillimheugmi
43Goami 3(고아미3)106Hanareum 2(하남벼)169Shinbaeg(신백)232Gillinnogmi 1
44Goami 4(고아미4)107Jungmo1011(중모1011)170Shindongjinbyeo(신동진벼)233Gumei 2
45Goamibyeo(고아미벼)108Jungmo1014(중모1014)171Shingwangbyeo(신광벼)234Gumei 4
46Goun (고운)109Jungmo1015(중모1015)172Shinkeumobyeo(신금오벼)235Gyeongchal 1
47Gwangmyeongbyeo(광명벼)110Jungmo1012(중모1012)173Shinseonchalbyeo(신설찰벼)236Hawn
48Gyehwabyeo(계화벼)111Keumo 3(금오3)174Shintoheugmi(신토흑미)237Heijiao
49Haechanmulgeol(해찬멸경)112Keumobyeo(금오벼)175Shinunbong 1(신운봉1)238Heugchal
50Jinbo(진보)113Keumobyeo 1(금오벼1)176Sobibyeo(소비벼)239Heughyangjeong
51Haeoreumi(해오르미)114Keumobyeo 2(금오벼2)177Suan(수안)240Heugjangmichal
52Haepyeongbyeo(해평벼)115Keunnun(큰눈)178Suryejinmi(수려진미)241Highlandrice(Peru)
53Haepyeongchalbyeo(해평찰벼)116Keunseom(큰섬)179Suwon382(수원382)242Himinori
54Haiami(하이아미)117Malgeumi(말그미)180Taebaegbyeo(태백벼)243Hinohikari
55Hanam(하남)118Mananbyeo(만나벼)181Undubyeo(운두벼)244Hitomebore
56Hanareumbyeo(한아름벼)119Manchubyeo(만추벼)182Boseog(보석)245Hokuriku 147
57Handeul(한들)120Mangeumbyeo(만금벼)183Unil(운일)246Hoshinishiki
58Hangangchal 1(한강찰1)121Manhobyeo(만호벼)184Unkwangbyeo(운광벼)247Hosiaoba
59Hangangchalbyeo(한갈찰벼)122Manjong(만정)185Unmi(운미)248Hosiyudaka
60Hanmaeum(한마음)123Manmibyeo(만미벼)186Yeolbaeg(영백)249HP5546-1-2-2-3-3-1-1-1-6
61Mipum(미품)124Manna(만나)187Yangjobyeo(양조벼)250lpum(MNU)-36-2-
62Hanseol(한설)125Manpungbyeo(만평벼)188Yeonganbyeo(영강벼)GH1-2-10-1-2-3-2-1-3
63Heughyang(흑향)126Manweolbyeo(만월벼)189Yeonghaebyeo(영해벼)251IR64
252IR66158-38-3-2-1-1310Seonong11368북륙주(北陸酒)238426Unbong45(운봉45)
253IR68144-2B-2-2-3-1311Seonong12369べごあおば(베고아오바)427Unbong46(운봉46)
254IR71664-36-3-3-2312Seonong4370원씨대수(袁氏大穗)428Unbong47(운봉47)
255IR71684-36-3-3-2313Seonong6371Gyehwa32(계화32)429Yeongdeog51(영덕51)
256IR72314Seonong8372Iksan503(익산503)430Yeongdeog52(영덕52)
257IR73103-B-1-1-2-1-K1315SESIA373Iksan507(익산507)431Kangweon7(강원7)
258IR74371-54-1-1316SIANISILO374Iksan509익산(509)432Kangweon8(강원8)
259IRAT13317SLG-1375Iksan512(익산512)433Kangweon9(강원9)
260Jahyangna 861318SR21102-6-2-1-2-2376Iksan513(익산513)434Iksan527(익산527)
261Jasmine85319SR23783-30-3-3-2-1377Jinbu39(진부39)435Iksan528(익산528)
262Jeogtomi(적토미)320SR30071-3-7-23-6-2-1-1-1378Jinbu45(진부45)436Iksan529(익산529)
263Jiangchuanlao-pinzhong-14321SWH100(52)-25-11-1379Jinbu46(진부46)437Iksan530(익산530)
264Jinling-78-102322Takanari380Milyang232(밀양232)438Iksan531(익산531)
265Kahei323Tetep381Milyang235(밀양235)439Iksan532(익산532)
266Kanto208324TN-1382Milyang238(밀양238)440Iksan533(익산533)
267Kinuhikari325Tung Ting Wan Hien 1383Sangju39(상주39)441Iksan534(익산534)
268Kirara397326TW16384Mokwoo(목우)442Milyang253(밀양253)
269Koshihikari327Ultra Merah385Suwon520(수원520)443Milyang254(밀양254)
270Kusahonami328Unnam Agr. Inst. 1386Unbong43(운봉43)444Milyang255(밀양255)
271LA1329Unnam Agr. Inst. 2387Unbong44(운봉44)445Milyang256(밀양256)
272LGC-1330Unnam Agr. Inst. 3388Yeongdeog47(영덕47)446Milyang257(밀양257)
273LGC-soft331Unnam Univ 2389Yeongdeog50(영덕50)447Milyang258(밀양258)
274Majado332Wangchal390Cheolweon78(철원78)448Milyang259(밀양259)
275Manjushree333Weld pally391Cheolweon79(철원79)449Milyang260(밀양260)
276Midorinomochi334Yeonchal 1392Cheolweon80(철원80)450Milyang261(밀양261)
277Milky Princess335YG 7393Gyehwa33(계화33)451Milyang262(밀양262)
278Milky Queen336Yinguang394Iksan516(익산516)452Milyang263(밀양263)
279Milyang21(밀양21)337YR21907Acp96-4-2-2395Iksan517(익산517)453Suwon538(수원538)
280Mirenishiki338YR22156-B-B-B-4396Iksan518(익산518)454Suwon543(수원543)
281Mochiminori339YR22156-B-B-B-45397Iksan519(익산519)455Suwon544(수원544)
282Musashino 7340YR22627-26-2-2398Iksan520(익산520)456Yeongdeog53(영덕53)
283N29341YR23517Acp79399Iksan521(익산521)457Yeongdeog54(영덕54)
284Namjo342YR24099-B-B-71-1400Iksan522(익산522)458N22
285NEP HUONG343YR24149Acp76-4-1-2401Iksan523(익산523)459Dular
286Nipponbare344YR24353-60-1-1402Iksan524(익산524)460Gyeonggi3(경기3)
287Nogmi345YR24982-9-1403Iksan525(익산525)461Gyehwa35(계화35)
288Nohong346Yumechukusi404Jinbu48(진부48)462Milyang264(밀양264)
289Norin PL9347Yun 60405Jinbu49(진부49)463Milyang265(밀양265)
290NR10353-8-2-1348Yungengou 15406Milyang242(밀양242)464Milyang266(밀양266)
291Odorokimochi349Yunhwae 422407Milyang243(밀양243)465Milyang267(밀양267)
292OOBA350Yunjing 4408Milyang244(밀양244)466Milyang268(밀양268)
293OPKI 2351Yuza 34409Milyang245(밀양245)467Milyang269(밀양269)
294P 1401352Zhy-Lian-Ari-Yun-Nan410Milyang246(밀양246)468Milyang270(밀양270)
295Padi Adongdumarat353Yunnongchamssal(운농참쌀)411Milyang247(밀양247)469Milyang271(밀양271)
296PALLAGI 153354Gopumbyeo(고품벼)412Milyang248(밀양248)470Milyang272(밀양272)
297Pampanga 7355Beulgeunchalbyeo(붉은찰벼)413Milyang249(밀양249)471Sangju45(상주45)
298PERVOMAJSZKIJ356China collection 1414Milyang250(밀양250)472Sangju46(상주46)
299PokhariliMashino357Geumtap(금탑)415Milyang251(밀양251)473Suwon546(수원546)
300Princess Sari358Sharaebyeo red(샤레벼)416Milyang252(밀양252)474Suwon547(수원547)
301Radha-4359Sharaebyeo brown(샤레벼)417Sangju41(상주41)475Suwon548(수원548)
302Sakaichal 243360Wangchalbyeo(왕찰벼)418Sangju42(상주42)476Suwon549(수원549)
303Sanghaehyanghyeolna361Yaecheonchalbyeo419Suwon527(수원527)477Suwon550(수원550)
304Sanho362미산금(美山錦)420Suwon528(수원528)478Suwon551(수원551)
305Sasanishiki363북륙사(北陸飼)209421Suwon529(수원529)479Suwon552(수원552)
306Sasanishiki BL4364서남나(西南糯)141422Suwon530(수원530)480Yeongdeog55(영덕55)
307Satojiman365조자(朝紫)423Suwon531(수원531)
308Seogeum(Seonong 13)366농림(農林)1424Suwon532 (수원532)
309Seonong10367홍의(紅衣)425Suwon533(수원533)

REFERENCES

1
T Aziz, M A Rahmatullah Maqsood, M A Tahir, I Ahmad and M A Cheema, Pakistan J Bot, Phosphorus utilization by six brassica cultivars (Brassica juncea L) from tri-calcium phosphate, a relative insoluble P compound, 38; 1529-1538 (2006)
2
S E Beebe, M Rojas, X Yan, M W Blair, F Pedraza, F Munoz, J Tohme and J P Lynch, Crop Sci, Quantitative trait loci for root architecture traits correlated with phosphorus acquisition in common bean, 46; 413-423 (2006)
3
R L Bieleski, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol, Phosphate pools, phosphate transport, and phosphate availability, 24; 225-52 (1973)
4
P H Brunner, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Substance flow analysis as a decision support tool for phosphorus management, 14(6); 870-3 (2010)
5
D Cordell, Linkoping University, The story of phosphorus. Sustainability implications of global phosphorus scarcity for food security (2010)
6
S Heuer, X Lu, J H Chin, J P Tanaka, H Kanamori, T Matsumoto, T De Leon, V J Ulta, A M Ismail, M Yano and M Wissuwa, Plant Biotechnol. J, Comparative sequence analysis of the major quantitative trait locus phosphorus uptake 1(Pup1) reveal acomplex genetic structure, 7; 456-471 (2009)
7
H Hung, PhD thesis. A and M university. Texas, Studies on tillering ability of rice under phosphorus stress (1985)
8
S M Kaeppler, J L Parke, S M Muelle, L Senior, C Stuber and W F Tracy, Crop Sci, Variation among maize inbred lines and determination of QTL for growth at low phosphorus and responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, 40; 358-364 (2000)
9
U Khalid, Rice Science, Effect of phosphorus and orrogation levels on yield, water productivity, phosphorus use efficiency and income of lowland rice in northwest Pakistan, 20(1); 61-72 (2013)
10
NIAST (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology), Methods of soil and plant analysis, Jeon-ju Korea. RDA. (2000)
11
Rural Development Administration, , Standard cultivation methods of rice, Jeon-ju Korea. RDA. (2001)
12
I Steen, Phosphorus and Potassium, Phosphorus availability in the 21st Century: management of a nonrenewable resource, 217; 25-31 (1998)
13
H A U De Haes, J Jansen, L A Van Der Weijden and W J A L Smit, Phosphate-from surplus to shortage. In: Policy memorandum of the steering Committee for Technology Assessment, Utrecht. Ministry of Agriculture Nature and Food Quality . (2009)
14
A L Smit, P S Bindraban, J J Schrodor, J G Conijn and H G Van Der Neer, Phosphorus in agriculture: global resources trends and developments, Wageningen The Netherlands. Plant Research International B.V. (2009)
15
D A Vaccari, Scientific American, Phosphorus: a looming crisis, 300; 54-59 (2009)
16
J Varley, Analyst, The determination of N, P, and K ions in plant materials, 91; 119-126 (1966)
17
M Wissuwa, K Gatdula and A Ismail, Plant Phys, Candidate gene characterization at the Pup1 locus, a major QTL increasing tolerance to phosphorus deficiency? Small causes with big effects, 133; 1947-1958 (2005)
18
M Wissuwa, M Yano and N Ae, Theor. Appl. Genet, Mapping for phosphorusdeficiency tolerance rice (Oryza sativa L), 97; 777-783 (1998)
페이지 상단으로 이동하기