Development of Stable Culture Techniques for Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)

Chan-Ho Kang; Young-Jin Yu; Kyu-Hwan Choi; Hyo-Jin Kim; Yong-Kyu Shin; Gong-Jun Lee; Do-Young Ko; Young-Ju Song; Chung-Kon Kim

doi:10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.3.375

All Issue

2014 Vol.59, Issue 3 Preview Page Next Page

Original Research Article

Development of Stable Culture Techniques for Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) 케나프 생산성 향상을 위한 안정 재배기술 개발

30 September 2014. pp. 375-384

PDF XML

Abstract

Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) was recognized as a potential source of forage. But the domestic cultivation techniques are not set standards yet. So we tested the basic culture techniques during 2012~2013 for getting a high yield and good grade forage production system. The best seeding method for mechanized planting (corn planter used) was hill seeding with 20×20 cm seeding distance. When we treated hill seeding with 20×20 cm, the yield what we could get was 13,641 kg/10a and it was 32% more than that of conventional practice hill seeding with 20×30 cm seeding distance. The proper seeding date for getting high yield was May 1. In May 1, the yield per 10a was reached 13,423 kg, and it was 30% more than that of seeding at May 30. More over the crude protein content which was important factor for determinating forage nutritive value was 12.7% and it was higher 1.8% (relatively 16.5% high) than that of May 30 seeding. The most effective herbicide for kenaf was Fluazipof-p-butyl. It’s herbicidal rate was 97% and phyto-toxicity was less than 5%. Regional adaptability for Jeollabuk-Do including Imsil Gun, Kochang Gun and Sunchang Gun were identified that the stable cultivation were possible in these area with average yield 12,400 kg/10a and it was about 1.7 times as compared to corn harvest.

Keywords

Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.)

Seeding density

Seeding date

Herbicide

References

인용문헌(REFERENCES)

HL Bhardwaj, CLM Rangappa and CL Webber, Proc. Int. Kenaf Assoc. Vonf. Irving. TX, Potential of kenaf as a forage, 7; 95-103 (1995)

V Bledsoe, Kenaf : Alternative fiber, Texas, USA. Contryside Pub. (1999)

GM Cahilly, Potential value of kenaf tops as a livestock feedstuffProc. first conf. kenaf for pulp, Gainsville, Fl, 48, (Abstr.) (1967)

TF Clark and IA Wolff, TAPPI, A search for new fiber crops, XI. Compositional characteristics of illinois kenaf at several population densities and maturities, 52; 2606-2116 (1969)

TH Dao, W Lonkerd, S Rao, R Meyer and L Pellack, Argon. Abstr, Kenaf in a semi-arid environment and forage quality in Oklahoma, 130 (1989)

DW Evans, AH Hang, J Janick and JE Simon, Kenaf in irrigated central washington; 409-410, New York. New crops. Wiley. (1993)

JE Hollowell, BS Baldwin and DL Lang, Proc. 8th Ann. Inter. Kenaf Vonf., Evaluation of kenafs a potential forage for the southern Unite States; 34-38 (1996)

CH Hovermale, Effect of row width and nitrogen rate on biomass yield of kenafFourth Int. Kenaf. Conf. Proc, Ladonia, TX; 35-40, Int. Kenaf Assn. (1993)

L Hurse and RE Bledsoe, Kenaf grown as a forage crop in Northeast TexasProc. Assoc. Advancement of Industria Crops, Peoria, IL; 13, (Abstr.) (1989)

GB Killinger, Kenaf a potential paper-pulp for Floridasecond Int. Kenaf Conf, Palm Beach, FL; 54-57 (1964)

GB Killinger, Fla. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Proc., Potential uses of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), 27; 4-11 (1967)

GB Killinger, Argon. J, Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) a multiuse crop, 61; 734-736 (1969)

EK Mark and WN Samuel, Kenaf Tolerance to Various Postemergence Herbicides Registered for Other Crops Grown in the Delta of Mississippi, 1993, 5, Publications Section, Office of Agricultural Communications, Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University. (1992)

A Miyazaki, W Agata, F Kubota, Y Matsuda and X Song, Bio-production and water cleaning by plant growth with floating culture system. Ⅱ. Water cleaning effects by the growth of several plant species6th inter. Conf. of thr conservation and management of lakes Kasumigaura, 95(1); 560-563 (1995)

WA Phillips, S Rao and T Dao, Nutritive value of immature whole plant kenaf and mature kenaf tops for growing rumminsntsProc. Assoc. Advancement of industrial Crops, Peoria, IL; 17-22 (1989)

GW Powell and JM Wing, Kenaf as silageProc. First Conf. kenaf for pulp, Gainsville, Fl, 49, (Abstr.) (1967)

KS Shin, WJ Hwang, SH Lee, CH Kim and YM Yoon, KOREAN J. ORGANIC AGRI, Nutrient Value and Yield Response of Forage Crop Cultivated in Reclaimed Tidal Land Soil Using Anaerobic Liquid Fertilizer, 20(4); 669-685 (2012)

W Suriyajantratong, RE Tucker, RE Sigafus and GEJr Mitchell, J. Anim. Sci, Kenaf and rice straw for sheep, 37; 1251-1254 (1973)

RS Swingle, AR Urias, JC Doyle and RL Voigt, J. Anim. Sci, Chemical composition of kenaf forage and its digestibility by lambs and in vitro, 46; 1346-1350 (1978)

PJ Van Soest, Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Use of Detergents in Analysis of Fibrous Feeds II. A Rapid Method for Determination of Fiber and Lignin, 46(5); 829-835 (1963)

CL Webber, III and Bledsoe, Kenaf : Production, harvesting, processing and products; 416-421, New York. New crops. Wiley. (1993)

JM Wing, Feedstuffs, Ensilability, acceptability and digestibility of kenaf, 39, 26 (1967)

Information

Publisher :The Korean Society of Crop Science
Publisher(Ko) :한국작물학회
Journal Title :The Korean Journal of Crop Science
Journal Title(Ko) :한국작물학회지
Volume : 59
No :3
Pages :375-384
Received Date : 2014-05-21
Revised Date : 2014-06-19
Accepted Date : 2014-07-29
DOI :https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2014.59.3.375

The Korean Journal of Crop Science ISSN:0252-9777(Print) 2287-8432(Online) 한국작물학회지

All Issue

인용문헌(REFERENCES)